Infertility issues in india

Biological parents are the child's owners.
This has no meaning because the biological parents are not owners of the Child, and the Court of Cassation nevertheless accepts that they behave as such by agreeing among themselves, in the contract of GPA, how they are distributed the child a fee. So that will mean for the child the words of the surrogate mother of his act of French birth? A reminder to life because it sold it? And that the French courts found that normal?
The Supreme Court thus disregarded the French law, but it does not spring haloed prestige of the great judge. Instead, it appears only as the servant of the European Court of Human Rights. She wanted to believe that the European Court ordered France to transcribe the proceedings. Already, even though it would have been the case, it would have to resist, because how the homeland of human rights Could validate abuses against women and children, on the grounds that the European court would order ? Then it's just an excuse, because the Supreme Court has gone beyond the requirements of the European Court.
The Supreme Court ignored the French law. It no longer appears as the servant of the ECHR.
Indeed, the European Court had deplored the fact that the absence of transcription resulted uncertainties on the nationality of children and inheritance, two points have been clarified since the European arrest. Contrary to what the European Court thought he could see, the affiliation of children has always been recognized. She was not transcribed, but it was recognized, and France would incur no reproach on this point of "recognition".